Comments on: Tim Flawless Natural RSD Video – Rehashing Self Help?

By: Adam Elite

Adam Elite — Sun, 07 Jun 2009 17:10:19 +0000

Come on guys, “The Game” came out in 2005 which was more than four years ago (doesn’t time fly?).

There are far better MPUAs out there worth discussing.

If it weren’t for Neil Strauss opening that can of worms no-one would be discussing………….who are we discussing again?

Yes I torrented The Blueprint (and deleted it immediately). I wouldn’t keep anything that makes Tom Cruise’s Scientology Medal of Valour Youtube speech look normal.

By: Nephilim

Nephilim — Sat, 30 May 2009 15:50:43 +0000

Look, there’s a lot that I don’t like about RSD, but let’s be honest. All I know is that I wasn’t getting any girls before I immersed in RSD, Juggler, and DYD. Then over about 9 months of just doing what the seminars told me, trusting in a foreign set of bearings, I began to get the success.

Overpriced, yeah, but RSD was like college. College teaches you the shit you need – and don’t need – for a job to make money. RSD teaches you a lot of shit you don’t need, but some stuff that really can help you get on the track to insane success with women – and people in general. And like college, it’s overhyped and priced.

By: Danielle

Danielle — Wed, 15 Apr 2009 19:11:38 +0000

The product is great. My game improved TONS from it & is the best “method” I’ve used. Its basically 3or4 other unnamed natural methods with his cool spin and originality. Since when Haas being cool not got a guy laid? Cuz that’s what RSD teaches. No wonder nerd KJS have to diss them.

By: Blahhh rOrO

Blahhh rOrO — Tue, 14 Apr 2009 04:50:32 +0000

hahahahaha lmfao to the haters… whats wrong with you dudes.. just spread that love and bang these girls…frikin internet jockies stay suckin Rsd. you dudes hate your life so you bash on dudes who have awesome ones so you can feel good about yourself

By: analyst

analyst — Sat, 28 Feb 2009 09:30:48 +0000

I saw the entire Flawless Natural DVDs yesterday in one session (got it from a torrent) and there are some useful hints in there, that I won’t deny. But 90% of what Tim talks about I have already read on free pickup forums, the other 10% I haven’t found there yet. In total, if I was a newbie to pickup, Flawless Natural would have been a pretty bad starting point because most of it is just a lot of hot air. Seriously, I could summarise what Tim stretches out for 5 solid hours in a short list with maybe 20 bullet points.

For $270 that product is WAY overpriced. I pity the fool who pay this price.

By: Lovechild

Lovechild — Wed, 04 Feb 2009 10:14:07 +0000

Woowoo Said:

“RSD is a cult. Cults have true believers. There are lots of people who genuinely think RSD helped them, just like every cult has its defenders. Maybe RSD has helped some people, after all the placebo effect is real…”

I guess you better read this:

http://www.mindcontrol101.com/pdfs/How_Cults_Seduce.pdf

Man I can’t believe i got in to that shit! I know some of you guys are drinking a lot of “Haterade!” but i think, you guys might be right! I can’t believe i fall on that self-help Bullshit!

So much for all that nonsense…like WOO! hehehe!

By: pauls

pauls — Fri, 23 Jan 2009 17:40:47 +0000

i love seeing ppl that dont believe in david d’s material.

ha sucks for you guys.

i read his book about 4 times in a one month span and 10x more action and had girls buying me shit

but i hope you dont look at david d’s material, we dont need more guys that can get girls…..have fun touching yourself at night.

By: Hammer

Hammer — Mon, 19 Jan 2009 00:20:54 +0000

Donovan, what’s up with all of the RSD fanboys commenting on your blog? God knows how many others are emailing you. My condolences.

By: daniel

daniel — Sat, 17 Jan 2009 07:50:26 +0000

Why at the end does he say Savoy as one of the guys who have something to “back it up” by back it up did you mean “steal it from mystery?”

By: Je

Je — Sat, 17 Jan 2009 07:42:12 +0000

i agree about the David D. student’s (most anyway) don’t get laid. i’m a fan ~ and do btw ~ but i was already pretty good b4 him. my point is the dudes at his seminars seem to be total luzrs/geeks, but most of all ~ they don’t have that DRIVE to be good. But if you’re already cool etc… it helps, LOTS!!!!

By: Woo Woo

Woo Woo — Fri, 16 Jan 2009 05:07:13 +0000

So RSD actually *stole* “WOO!!!!”?

As in, someone from RSD saw another guy making a total ass of himself and was like – fuck, we need to rip this shit off and pretend we thought it up?

That I can’t believe.

By: gigi

gigi — Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:44:27 +0000

> Basically I don’t care . . .when the information they provide actually makes me better with woman

I tend to think so too.

RSD guys deserve 10 times the bashing that they’re getting, they are a very, very, shady bunch.

However their material is quite healthy, especially for the shy introvert over analytical person, which is the general prototype of those who seek dating advice I believe.

That’s why I tend not to actively bash them – because I think their material can be helpful, even if it comes from a shady source..

By: Water

Water — Thu, 15 Jan 2009 11:20:28 +0000

You say that RSD stole materials.

- Those are big words for a small man. What I see is a man who criticizes something that he does not understand.

How do you know that they stole materials ?

Even if they had the same materials as the other pickup gurus it doesn’t necessary mean that they stole them. They might just reinvented them (not the case here, rsd products are unique)

-> at least this is my perspective.

By: Woo Woo

Woo Woo — Thu, 15 Jan 2009 01:05:20 +0000

Is “WOO” really worth referencing?

RSD is a cult. Cults have true believers. There are lots of people who genuinely think RSD helped them, just like every cult has its defenders. Maybe RSD has helped some people, after all the placebo effect is real…

By: Intime

Intime — Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:36:45 +0000

if he has to reference then he should reference everything, or else what should he reference and what shouldnt he?

By: Intime

Intime — Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:30:55 +0000

erm i dun get it

so is tim supposed to say. ” ok guys i am now going to talk about woo, which is similar to a state talked about in 19XX by richard bandler,1745 by kinto spike, 1989 by ross jeffries, 2002 by david deangelo”

to be honest. in that program, its not like he even credits Tyler with anything. And no one is complaining about it. like seriously he doesnt even use terms that RSD pple are familiar with like nimbus and such.

Maybe some pple would be happier if he said. “Ok this one. tyler taught me. this one, jeffy taught me, this one, geoff taught me, this one, ozzie taught me, this one, papa taught me”

so he just teaches with no references, and some pple will be unhappy. SO BOO HOO

By: Donovan

Donovan — Tue, 13 Jan 2009 08:07:25 +0000

@thegambit: Good point.

@paul: I don’t care, those were the guys experiences. I can’t chop the end of the video off.

@karim: Did for me and lots of other guys I get emails from. Everyone? No.

@Monstar: 1. That isn’t reverse psychology. 2. I am bias. I dislike RSDs tactics and have said SINCE I found out. I didn’t bash RSD for years until I received countless emails from guys about it. 3. I can do what ever I want on my blog. If you don’t like it, read elsewhere. Be my guest!

By: Karim

Karim — Tue, 13 Jan 2009 03:34:05 +0000

I think most guys are paying money to help learn how to quickly and easily learn how to pick up chicks. WHo gives a damn about references and credits, if you or anyone else thinks they’ve copied material off someone else, fine, take the legal route.

David Deanglo’s fanbase must be the biggest KJ losers in the whole seduction community, and I doubt davids material ever got anyone laid.

By: Johnny

Johnny — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:12:39 +0000

RSD is a clown show

The whole pick up community is a scam

By: Paul

Paul — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:58:08 +0000

LOL @ Roger:)

Donovan, RSD is as full of shit as is Dr.Paul, Janka or Savoy btw.
ALL of those are clowns.