Wow…I dodged a bullet there, I suppose.

As for “quality”, I think that’s different than “qualities”.

The “qualities” a particular guy wants in a woman is subject to interpretation, as described.

When I talk about a “quality woman” though (which is frequently), it’s all about things like emotional stability, healthy attitude towards men, desire to do the right thing rather than manipulate/destroy, and trustworthiness.

Women who are intent on making a man’s life miserable only to cuckold him and take the kids/money/SUV later are decidedly not under the “high-quality” category. Even if they’re hot, fun, and like sushi.

What “a woman of quality” means depends upon what qualities you value.

A sense of humor?

Imagination?

Playfulness?

Wildness?

If your definition of quality includes “high sexual status and men putting her on a pedastal”…

if your definition of “quality” includes “job success and power and a very serious life”…

even if your definition of “quality” includes “high intelligence and an intellectually very serious job”…

taking her to that place in her mind where she’s playful and free can continue to generate extraordinary attraction.

And men who do it with true intelligence and real creativity are rare.

26, sadly, is not one of them.

I think John wants Catholic school women… the nuns, that is.

Most of those shows (plus many more) “trivialize” some really devastating things that happen in the world, including natural disasters, human rights violations, wars, diseases, heinous crimes, etc. It’s part of comedy, and I dont think it takes away the impact of people’s suffering at all.

To me, this article makes me think about how irrational some world leaders really are, and that this conflict in Tibet should never have happened at all.

Besides that, it prompted me to do some real research on the entire situation and I’m now more aware of the conflict than I was before.

But Matt’s right, that 26 tries far too hard to be “wacky”.

A women of quality who’s experienced a bit of life will see straight through it. Hell, if WE can see through it, what makes you think a women can’t?

Plus his whole identity (ie. his name ’26′) is based upon the age he lost of virginity. Not very attractive.

Court jesters don’t attract women of quality.

Plus I didn’t find his trivialization of the Tibet issue funny, and to those that did find it funny – you deserve to remain virgins.

Thats what I like about C + F.

A guy who “gets it” and knows what is “lame” would totally bag the guy selling the “look me funny” routine/

“wow what a zany guy” </sarcasm