Comments on: David Wygant On Approaching

By: LoveCharm

LoveCharm — Sun, 07 Jun 2009 21:25:15 +0000

I think Wygant is excellent.

He’s the type of guy you want to listen to when you absorb so much pick-up material that you can get confused. I’ve seen this happen to many people (or if you want to be called PUA’s) and it’s refreshing to listen to David talk about actually having a conversation with a woman. No more bullshitting around and trying to tactically manipulate a woman using strict PU material.

In the past i’ve looked into many ‘styles’. From Mystery Method, Paul Janka and Payton Kane to Mode One, David X and now David Wygant.

Mystery and Payton Kane were too manipulative for me. Paul Janka and Mode One gave me great abundance but i lost a lot more women than i normally would due to the sheer ‘get in, get number, get out’ mentality behind these style. This took the fun out of meeting women for me. David X, well, i’ve always been a fan of. He made me realise a lot of stuff about myself and why i’m learning to be more successful with women. I’ve got a much more solid foundation thanks to David X. I’ll always be a fan of his.

David Wygant puts the fun and normality back into attracting the opposite sex. Be the best you and talk to women. No bullshit chat up lines. No thinking about how to strategically get her into bed. Just good old conversation.

And come on, not many people can call themselves the real Hitch

LC.

By: SuspectJonah

SuspectJonah — Mon, 19 Jan 2009 21:28:40 +0000

I think he’s great, rather than all opening lines and negs you have to try and remember, he is all about just feeling brilliant with yourself, and not being afraid to approach, I’m a massive fan of Mystery Method, but David Wygants stuff feels more natural to me

By: KevinB

KevinB — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 11:54:50 +0000

A friend of mine attended one of his workshops and said his teachings are excellent and unique. More close to Carlos Xuma techniques. I would recommend David Wygant’s tips over most PUA bootcamps.

By: Star

Star — Mon, 10 Dec 2007 22:27:25 +0000

seductionreview.net is the only site I know of that has ratings of the different styles and products.

By: Mike Lehmann

Mike Lehmann — Mon, 10 Dec 2007 14:55:02 +0000

David’s emphasis on observation and making genuine comments based on that to approach seems much more elaborate than “normal” situational openers advocated by other PUAs. I think this is the one thing that distinguishes his teachings from most other schools. The rest are the usual confidence, attraction, rapport, etc. techniques.

Has anyone ever categorised the different PUA masters and their teachings? I think that this can help many learners to choose the right teacher.

By: Magit

Magit — Sat, 08 Dec 2007 09:35:28 +0000

Fight fight. jk

Good to see you around here david. You should do an interview with the blog.

By: David Wygant

David Wygant — Fri, 07 Dec 2007 23:57:03 +0000

Poking around and found this.

Thanks for the write up.

I will poke the seduction community from time to time…..but I have been at this longer than most and all my publicity comes from being in the media for the last 8 years.

As for negs…and all the silly nicknames…yes you are 100% correct I will poke fun at that.

Men need to learn real confidence not manufactured confidence.

I believe that you need to stand on your own two feet and brand your name.

I never wanted to be called a silly nickname…unless of course it was in the heat of passion with a woman:)

By: Nirvanos

Nirvanos — Fri, 07 Dec 2007 04:32:50 +0000

He’s ok… he never ever went the path of looking up what others had done (kinda like mystery) and invented his stuff from the ground up.

He’s kinda… a nice mixture of the mainstream/pickup stuff… very balanced.

Sometimes he tends to take too much pokes at the seduction community, missusing stuff to create publicity (like creating media drama about negs) in order to draw at attention…

But aside from that he’s pretty solid.